|
|
Post by Chris Moulton on Oct 17, 2009 2:22:08 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by Chris Moulton on Oct 17, 2009 11:39:08 GMT -5
Unofficial Results
Women
1. Carson (GUE) 17:20
2. Lalonde (GUE) 17:35
3. Pearo (MAC)
4. Jewett (TOR)
5. Cliff (GUE)
6. Laurie (GUE)
7. Liz Howard
8. McIvor (GUE)
9. Wyman (MAC)
10. Giovannetti (MAC)
11. Furtado (GUE)
12. Vanhie (GUE)
Brown ran but was apparently pacing a teammate.
Men
1. Brunsting (GUE) 31:50
2. Brett (GUE) 32:00
3. Parrott (GUE)
4. Chafe (UTTC)
5. Wray (GUE)
6. Lakehead (Sorry?)
7. Murray (GUE)
8. Patterson (QUE)
9. Koziarski (GUE)
10. Hinton (GUE)
|
|
|
|
Post by greener on Oct 17, 2009 13:05:45 GMT -5
Results are attached Attachments:
|
|
cda
Full Member
Posts: 267
|
Post by cda on Oct 17, 2009 14:53:28 GMT -5
6th was Andrew Nixon.
|
|
|
|
Post by moorezy on Oct 18, 2009 8:37:01 GMT -5
Any pictures?
|
|
|
|
Post by lambert on Oct 18, 2009 11:12:24 GMT -5
|
|
cda
Full Member
Posts: 267
|
Post by cda on Oct 18, 2009 11:38:30 GMT -5
By Fredrick Allan do they mean Charles? Unfortunately, yes. |
|
|
|
Post by abrown on Oct 18, 2009 13:50:02 GMT -5
so what's up with the serious drop in times in terms of depth from last year (up front is the same but it seems like all the teams have a lot more talent.. which is good for the OUA)
|
|
|
|
Post by moorezy on Oct 18, 2009 14:12:08 GMT -5
seems everyone is running better, i agree good for OUA and Canadian University Sport in general!
|
|
Chafe
Junior Member
Posts: 58
|
Post by Chafe on Oct 19, 2009 12:48:56 GMT -5
so what's up with the serious drop in times in terms of depth from last year (up front is the same but it seems like all the teams have a lot more talent.. which is good for the OUA) Can't speak on the depth, but the course was lightning fast on Saturday, which explains the much faster times. Based on my training I figured I was in 32:00 shape for a decent road 10km course... If Queen's had been in its usual October condition the times would have been 1:30+ slower. Draw your own conclusions on the depth from that! |
|
|
|
Post by slamer on Oct 19, 2009 14:42:55 GMT -5
so what's up with the serious drop in times in terms of depth from last year (up front is the same but it seems like all the teams have a lot more talent.. which is good for the OUA) Can't speak on the depth, but the course was lightning fast on Saturday, which explains the much faster times. Based on my training I figured I was in 32:00 shape for a decent road 10km course... If Queen's had been in its usual October condition the times would have been 1:30+ slower. Draw your own conclusions on the depth from that! maybe it was you who was lightning fast and not the course? Why don't you try a downhill 10km and see if you can become a "29 minute" guy. |
|
|
|
Post by greener on Oct 19, 2009 14:44:11 GMT -5
I agree the course was in great conditions on Saturday, but last year was pretty similar so I think you can make a fairly good comparison between these past 2 years. But pretty much any other race ran on that course over the past few years would certainly be slower because of the conditions - see OUAs 2008 - and not necessarily because of improvement.
|
|
|
|
Post by MattMc on Oct 19, 2009 17:00:12 GMT -5
While the conditions may have been fast it is by no means a 'fast course'. It is a great, scenic, oft-challenging grass course with constant rolls and turns that challenges you to get into a good rhythm.
My favorite XC race ever was in '99 at CIS there when it was unseasonably warm, windless and 6 of us flew over the hay bales to break Fonseca's record. Cocksedge was his usual enbeatable self on the grass running 30:51-- still standing record?
|
|
|
|
Post by slamer on Oct 19, 2009 20:17:59 GMT -5
My favorite XC race ever was in '99 at CIS there when it was unseasonably warm, windless and 6 of us flew over the hay bales to break Fonseca's record. Cocksedge was his usual enbeatable self on the grass running 30:51-- still standing record? I remember that CI well. I wish they would bring back those hay bails. I loved them. |
|
|
|
Post by journeyman on Oct 19, 2009 20:38:05 GMT -5
My favorite XC race ever was in '99 at CIS there when it was unseasonably warm, windless and 6 of us flew over the hay bales to break Fonseca's record. Cocksedge was his usual enbeatable self on the grass running 30:51-- still standing record? I remember that CI well. I wish they would bring back those hay bails. I loved them. Might that be the year the second place team had a 5th man in the 50s? (and like four in the top 20?) |
|
|
|
Post by coldneck on Oct 19, 2009 21:16:11 GMT -5
We (Guelph) won without having any All-Canadians. Although our 1-5 split was about 7 seconds.
|
|
|
|
Post by greener on Oct 19, 2009 21:24:16 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by journeyman on Oct 20, 2009 6:22:12 GMT -5
I was just refering to slamer's comment in the other thread about "certain teams" who came second with a guy in the 50s. I knew that he was that guy. |
|
|
|
Post by ronb on Oct 20, 2009 18:47:39 GMT -5
greener....you are an Internet wizard. Please post the results of every cross-country race ever run in Canada...Thx...  |
|
|
|
Post by slamer on Oct 20, 2009 20:38:45 GMT -5
I was just refering to slamer's comment in the other thread about "certain teams" who came second with a guy in the 50s. I knew that he was that guy. I guess I've been out-ed. Yeah, my point in the other thread was everyone elses... being competitive is relative to others. Guelph's highest placer was Steve Bendo at 18th. But there were also 6 guys in 3 seconds, between 18 & 24. Anyway, without Lanny Mann's collapse it would have been a different race. Calgary would have easily won. Fun times really. But oh those hay bails. Bring back that hay. |
|
john
New Member
Posts: 47
|
Post by john on Oct 20, 2009 21:04:04 GMT -5
I was going to post some these same memories from CIS (CIAU) '99, but already mentioned. With a 26-point spread between the first and fifth place teams are there some history buffs who can enlighten us as to other years that had such a level of parity at CIS?
|
|
tc
New Member
Posts: 25 
|
Post by tc on Oct 20, 2009 21:29:27 GMT -5
i think Guelph set a record in '99 for the highest winning score at CI's.
|
|
|
|
Post by ronb on Oct 20, 2009 22:06:09 GMT -5
Please be cautious not to speak too much of the glorious history of CIS/CIAU Cross Country Running....it will really piss off the NAIA crowd here...
|
|
|
|
Post by greener on Oct 22, 2009 18:51:50 GMT -5
Ron - when midterms are over I'll get on the results  Oh and I'll make sure the NAIA/Former-CIS crowd knows how much they got romped in cross at CIS back in the day... jk McInnis - Hay bails eh? hmm... seems like fun, you going to bring some? I think Lakins is looking for some for CIS/FISU and hey can't break the course record if there's no hay bails haha |
|
|
|
Post by pq on Oct 22, 2009 18:55:23 GMT -5
I think Lakins is looking for some for CIS/FISU and hey can't break the course record if there's no hay bails haha Is Shane still involved with hosting the meet? |
|
Oh and I'll make sure the NAIA/Former-CIS crowd knows how much they got romped in cross at CIS back in the day... jk