Max
Junior Member
Posts: 71
|
Post by Max on Aug 5, 2004 10:27:03 GMT -5
Does anyone know where to find the NACAC results? The Sherbrooke website is ridiculously shitty and they don't have results anywhere. Thanks.
|
|
|
|
Post by results on Aug 5, 2004 11:10:21 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by Kyle on Aug 5, 2004 13:30:40 GMT -5
This meet seems hit and miss with the numbers and quality fields. Why wouldn't they open up the age for a better meet and round out the fields?
Desy
|
|
wow
New Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by wow on Aug 5, 2004 15:27:23 GMT -5
I was very suprised with the very poor level of competition for this event...the results overall seem extremely poor in most events with a terrible turnout...
|
|
Max
Junior Member
Posts: 71
|
Post by Max on Aug 5, 2004 16:59:49 GMT -5
WOW! I thought NACAC was better than that! I'm very disapointed in those results. Hopefully this will get better for 2006.
|
|
myers
Full Member
Posts: 150
|
Post by myers on Aug 5, 2004 19:23:53 GMT -5
Last time I believe it was under 25 (although the level of competition wasn't much better). I have no idea why they narrowed the age range -- it seems insanely stupid. I think I read somewhere that AC voted against the change, though.
|
|
|
|
Post by NACAC in the know on Aug 6, 2004 6:07:22 GMT -5
It was very bad weather, this contributed to poor results. I find it funny to listen to everyone here trash the results, when let's face it none of you could have done any better.
|
|
kris
New Member
Posts: 44
|
Post by kris on Aug 6, 2004 6:32:53 GMT -5
Anyone who can run in 4 inches of rain on the track mixed with heavy wnids gets my respect
|
|
|
|
Post by johnny ryall on Aug 6, 2004 9:57:53 GMT -5
but the fields still suck shit
2 people in the womens 1500m?
FUCKING PATHETIC!!!!!!!
what a shame, some people finally get a chance to be on a national team, and the meet is a complete joke.
|
|
|
|
Post by Dude on Aug 6, 2004 20:36:08 GMT -5
I totally agree with the last post, it's suppose to be an international class event(well, almost) and it seems to me that it was more like an early season twilight meet!!!
|
|
|
|
Post by harber on Oct 17, 2004 23:42:14 GMT -5
a few clarifications.....1 they dropped the age class because every other area age class championships is done for the under 23 level example the european under 23 championships , so the nacac area has conformed to that standard in an effort for there to be a world age class competition at some time down the road. ....2 small fields , i agree very weak , not due to lack of interest or participation ....due to a lack of funds from the carribean contries , they just plain cant afford to send a complete team to the meet...no doubt that when the meet is held in that region the fields will be much larger because of the minimal travel expenditure for those smaller countries. ...3 results...also i agree that they were relatively weak compared to what you wuld expect from an international comp , 1 there was some shady weather situations ,2 the small fields attributed to it ,and 3 people dont really plan to peak for nacac , this meet was only a main focus for a few athletes anyone in the ncaa is geared towards that season and gets to do nacac as a bonus , others had to peak just to get on the team , competing at nacac is in some ways just an end of the year bonus.
|
|
