Post by SI on Jul 9, 2004 17:03:51 GMT -5
Without getting into the top 12 criteria that COC has set, the least they could have done, if they are going to set a real high bar, was make those criteria clear:
"That draft criteria stated that a mile equivalent, based upon IAAF performance tables, would be accepted for the second 2003 'A' standard. His Prefontaine performance was just under the 3:53.35 conversion.
But a late hour change in the rules forced Sullivan, at the time in heavy training, to chase yet another ‘A’ standard."
www.runnersweb.com/running/news/rw_news_20040709_RRW_Sullivan.html
"That draft criteria stated that a mile equivalent, based upon IAAF performance tables, would be accepted for the second 2003 'A' standard. His Prefontaine performance was just under the 3:53.35 conversion.
But a late hour change in the rules forced Sullivan, at the time in heavy training, to chase yet another ‘A’ standard."
www.runnersweb.com/running/news/rw_news_20040709_RRW_Sullivan.html